If you look closely you will notice that the advantages and disadvantages were written for a commercial benefit. This is definitely not a fair comparison. I think the whole article should be removed from Wikipedia.

What really is Project Management 2.0 anyway, is it just the online tool?

Thanks for the comment Susan,

This is one of the reasons why I am careful to separate ‘Agile Anarchists’ from serious business developers using Agile.

Managing agile projects needs a different paradigm to more traditional projects but the basics stay firmly in place. For a discussion on some of the key differences see a post by Lynda Bourne on the The Gentle Art of Managing Agile

Pat

In fact it is well know that Agile projects are the one’s most likely to suffer scope creep and a failure to launch with the deliverables expected.
So yes project management stakeholders may like the flexibility this gives them, but in reality this often means nothing more than an inability to make timely decisions. In such instance having a strong project manager is actually even more, rather than less important.

Regards

Susan de Sousa
Site Editor http://www.my-project-management-expert.com