Monday

The Evolution of Project Management

Note: this block has been superseded by a full article, incorporating the ideas below and others from an article published in the PMWJ. Download the augmented article from: https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PMKI-ZSY-005.php#Overview

Over the last few months, I have been working on a series of papers looking at the history of project management and project controls. This requires the classification of the various stages in the development of the practice of project management. However, almost every author of project management history has a different view of the major change points.

One take on the major phases of development of project management is fundamental changes are driven by changes in the project control tools and processes being used. Better control processes provide new insights, allowing improved or changed management approaches. Based on this framework, the major phases in the development of project management seem to be:

  1. From early times through to the 1960s – the traditional management of projects
  2. From the 1960s through to the present – modern project management
  3. Future interactive and intelligent systems – to be determined

Prior to the 1950s, the primary control tools showed static representations of cost and other deterministic data. The sophistication of both the management data and its representation in reports improved over the centuries, but the controls processes focused on reactive management actions to correct observed deviations from the plan. The people managing projects were priests, builders, engineers, or other authority figures.

The current phase of development of project controls uses largely deterministic information to predict future outcomes. This phase of development started in the late 1950s with the creation of PERT and CPM schedules, and has progressed through to the point where there is general acceptance that earned value and earned schedule are among the best of the predictive control tools.

This phase saw the creation of “modern project management” as the pioneers of computer-assisted project controls worked together to form the various project management institutes (including PMI in October 1969), and the institutes in turn defined and codified the practice of “modern project management.”

As a result, the people managing projects were increasingly identified as project managers. Various styles of project management are emerging (this was discussed in The Entropy at the heart of Project Management), but regardless of the approach, the concept of a project—run by a project manager, to create value for a client—is consistent. Project management is now expected to be proactive, working to minimize the negative effect of future problems identified using predictive tools, as well as dealing with any current negative variances.

The next generation of project controls is starting to emerge. These tools are predicted to be integrated, adaptive, and intelligent, with a focus on maximizing the efficient use of the project’s resources. They will use machine learning, and be integrated into the systems used to design and develop the project’s outputs rather than operating as standalone processes.

One example is the emergence of 5D BIM (five-dimensional building information modeling) in the construction/engineering industries. A three-dimensional design is integrated with the schedule (4D) and cost information (5D) to provide a single system accessed and used by everyone involved in the design, construction and future maintenance of a building or facility (see more on BIM). Project control tools with embedded intelligence are also emerging.

This current round of developments are too new to have much impact on the nature of project management today, but by the end of the 2020s we are likely to see as much change in the way projects are managed as occurred in the 1960s.

Do you think these phases in the development of project management are reasonable, or are there other major inflexion points? Your feedback will be welcome.

For more project management history see: https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PMKI-ZSY.php

3 responses to “The Evolution of Project Management

  1. All you have to do is compare these two videos, one showing how the Pyramid of Khufu was built 4500 years ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGqfdXkAQMk&t=568s

    Against this video from 2015 showing the construction of the Changsha Apartment Building in Hunan Province, a 57-story building built in 19 days https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLSbNxUP3s&t=42s

    This comparison will show very clearly what has changed and it can be summarized by the replacement of human power with machine power. Projecting this trend into the future can be seen in any automotive plant where robots do much of the work. Automation is going to continue to replace much of what we do today by humans. (The mining industry is now using driverless excavators and haul trucks)

    We also can see the use of new materials, many of which are petroleum based.

    But the fundamental PROCESSES are substantially unchanged. We still put our pants on one leg at a time.

    But the important point is what we are now doing is NOT working https://home.kpmg/au/en/home/insights/2020/08/australian-project-delivery-performance-survey-2020.html and before we start to automate any system, we need to first fix what is broken in that system, and the starting point is for PMI, AIPM, IPMA, AACE and all other organizations purporting to represent the practice of project management need to adopt the 5 attributes of the Scientific Method, https://sciencing.com/five-characteristics-scientific-method-10010518.html that has been developing and delivering new products and services to humans for 1,000 years now:
    1) Empirical
    2) Replicable
    3) Provisional
    4) Objective and
    5) Systematic.
    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-method/

    As George Santayana told us, “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

  2. Patrick, I am expecting a revolution in project management in the near future.
    There are two key factors:
    1. This revolution will be driven by new applications that allow solving problems that can’t be solved with current leading applications: Primavera and Microsoft Project. I refer to resource-limited risk-integrated probabilistic scheduling.
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) will be a new buzzy word, and new attempts to develop AI-based solutions will stress the PM market soon.
    However, the key change will not be driven just by technological solutions. Existing theoretical knowledge was sufficient to start the revolution 20 years ago. It is required but not a sufficient factor.
    2. There are existing PM solutions that are better than P6 and MSP, but there can’t compete with the marketing teams of IT giants.
    I can assume that the next tangible change will be ONLY when one of (current?) startups starts taking market shares from Oracle and Microsoft, and one of these companies (or Google, or E. Musk) purchase this start-up and use all their marketing power to take the large share of the market.

    As Oracle and Primavera have a significant lobby in the US PM construction and defence markets the new leading solution is likely to be from other country. China came to my mind as N1 candidate.
    You, as probably no one else, have unique experience in promoting innovative PM solutions. Do you think Australia has a chance to grow its own startup that could change PM again?

  3. You should mention Planalog. We had some large customers esp in oil refinery turnarounds. I ca send you literature.  Bob

Leave a comment